Nov 13
PFA troubled over drug tests - euFootball.BIZ - football (soccer …
The English Professional Footballers’ Association (PFA) is in opposition to mandatory drug testing for players. The proposition would require 30 players to be tested five times a year, in addition to the single tests done on one mime through club following each match.
The suggestion for the testing is an attempt to bring football under World Anti-Doping Agency regulations that apply to other team and Olympic sports. The new standard is set to be introduced in 2009. Players would need to be make their location known individual hour per day, including in the summer and holidays. This is already essence followed. Under the current Football Association regulations, missing three drug tests will lead to a two-year ban.
Olympic participants are familiar with the formula. Christine Ohuruogu, a sprinter, was banned in 2006 as a decision of wanting three tests and not actuality present at her stated location. If the decision had not been overturned, she would bring forth been banned permanently from the Olympic Games.
Tests would be done in players’ homes, and PFA most eminent executive Gordon Taylor stated that it would be some invasion of privacy. He also expressed frustration regarding the necessary conclusion that there is somebody to conceal, which stems from any complaint against drug testing.
In 2003, Rio Ferdinand, defender for Manchester United, was banned for eight months after failing a drug test done at Carrington’s training ground. Also in 2003, Chelsea goalkeeper Mark Bosnich tested positive for cocaine was banned for nine-months and fired.
This blog found on keywords: